Tuesday, January 2, 2024

Oh brother, someone tried to pass off some nasty quote as Biblical.

While no great Bible scholar here, the so-called "scripture" - without chapter and verses ... are we surprised ;/  Anyway, the first verse included, "thou shalt not commit adultery."  Okay, that makes Biblical sense - But mid way into the second "passage" ... things turned ugly; didn't sound Biblical. Now maybe i was out that Sunday, but nowhere in the Bible, do i recall women being called evil - the context being, women all a bunch of hell bound reprobates.  Someone else pointed to Matthew 5:27-30.

Nope.

Here turns out, quote was from the Testament of Reuben - one of those books that didn't make the cut.  The Bible is the Lord's word, for real - evidently, the Lord had his reasons to include, or exclude, certain books.

Guess the guy who posted the comment didn't expect there'd be someone paying attention.  Anyway, the guy came back with all, "well, it should be in the Bible."  And i guess some cheerleader, back in '93, should have agreed to go dutch with him to mickeyDs.

But all quips aside.  The real issue is :  who else read the thread?  Some God hating ...  whatever, who came away from that "scripture" with yet one more reason to hate the Lord?  This happens.  By the way dutchy goes by some high-sounding religious handle...figures :/  

2 comments:

  1. It's people like that guy ('Christian' in name only) who gives others a bad rap.

    ReplyDelete